05 mei 2010 00:07
Berhutang pada Rakyat
                                                                                                                                | Title | : 
 | Berutang  pada Rakyat | 
 | Language | : 
 | Bahasa Indonesia | 
 | Author 
 | : 
 | Chaidir | 
| Editor | : 
 | Mahyudin  Al Mudra et al. | 
| Publisher | : 
 | Adicita Karya Nusa, Yogyakarta | 
| Edition 
 | : 
 | First,  May 2002 | 
| Pages 
 | : 
 | xxi  + 187 pages | 
| Dimension | : 
 | 0.9  x 19.9 cm | 
 
      Looking at  Chaidir’s position today, as head of Riau Regional House of Representatives, the  book Berutang Pada Rakyat (In  People’s Debt) maybe fits best to represent himself. It is normal and perhaps  “mandatory” for a high official to talk about debts to the people. In this  book, Chaidir seems to soliloquize or talking to himself about what he has  done, or will do, or plans to do for Riau and Indonesian people. 
    It is, thus, important  for the representatives to read the book because it can be an alarm to control  themselves. Chaidir’s fluency in explaining his views pleads for the book’s  small mistakes – for instance, the word “berhutang” (to owe/be in debt) in the  cover is written with “h” in it despite in the content, the word is written  without “h” (which is the right spelling).
    Promise and Debt
    Debt for some  people is very disturbing. It can even lead them to committing suicide. When  someone borrows money from bank and cannot pay it off, he will be stressed, or  feel disgraced, and maybe hang himself later. However, for some others, owing  money is in fact “a must” because being in debt can provide them motivation to  work. The merchants in traditional markets often say that they have to be in  debt because it can force them to come earlier to their kiosks or stalls. It  is, however, unfortunate that the merchants’ logic of subsistence is used by  the creditors or usurers to take as much as they can from the humble people’s  money.
    What if the  people’s representatives who are in debts? Or are they ever in debt? They are  rich people because otherwise, it is impossible for them to step up nominating  themselves as representatives in the election, aren’t they?
    It is true they  are all rich. But it by no means shows that they do not have debts. Ask them  how much money they have to deposit on the parties or they provide for making campaign  stickers, banners, and for the hairdressers and beauticians or the  photographers in order to make their faces appropriate enough to be shown on  the side of crossroads. Aside from financial debt, those in the House do in  fact have a greater amount of debt, namely promises. This debt is the promises  they make when they are being all the mouth to persuade people to vote for  them.
    During campaign, they  easily make promises of wellbeing, health insurance, free education,  employment, and millions of others with interesting “interests”. Nevertheless,  most or even all of the promises are only lip-service without real action. The  promises are not set in stone so that after the election, people will not know  how to make them pay their promises. Even promises written upon a paper, signed  with a seal and stamp on it can be broken, let alone those that are only said  (p. 15).
    Promises are  actually heavier to bear than financial debt, but what is wrong (not to say it  shameless) with them is that they think the other way round. The people are  forgetful and easy to deceive, moreover after given those t-shirts and stickers,  aren’t they?
    Hoping on the Power of Culture and God
    When people find  it difficult to provide evidence for the representatives’ debts and broken  promises they do not want to pay, what do they do? Do people protest by holding  a demonstration, burning and plundering things, killing those promisors, taking  over the parliamentary building until the residents go out? In fact, all of  those things have been done by Indonesians but the representatives remain who  they were before. They are drunk and walk on air after everything having what  they want.
    Man makes mistakes  and forgets things. But it is not appropriate to make an apology with the  saying. Malay culture has taught us that if a leader can no longer bear his  words, it is better to cling back to culture.
    Besarlah batang sagu bertampin
    Bila dikerat mati ujungnya
    Besarlah hutang para pemimpin
    Dunia akhirat kan  ditanggungnya (hal vii)
    (Big it is the  sago with the quid
    If gnawed dead will the tip be
    Big it is the  debt of the leaders
    They will bear it  in the world and the Hereafter) 
    Aside from  learning from culture, we should rely on God. It is only to God and culture  that a man can moan and complain and surrender because God will not break His  promises and culture contains the symbols, artifacts, and wisdoms that can  bring him back to the right path.
    Malay people as a  great ethnic group should really be proud of their culture as it protects them  from their leader’s evil. Malay man of letters and wise men have taught us how  to be a good leader. Knowing so, it is really disgraceful if there is a Malay  leader who is in people’s debt but does not want to pay it off.
    Yusuf Efendy
    Translation by  Reza Daffi (trans/15/04-10)
      Dibaca : 5.380 kali.